After Joe Cullen stormed off the Alexandra Palace stage in December 2025 and accused Mensur Suljovic of cheating, the darts world erupted.
But this wasn’t a one-off.
For over a decade, Mensur Suljovic has been accused of slow play, disruption, and psychological warfare by some of the biggest names in darts — including Gary Anderson, Jermaine Wattimena, and Joe Cullen. Others insist he’s done nothing wrong and is simply playing his own game.
So what’s the truth?
In this video, we break down:
How dartitis completely reshaped Suljovic’s throwing action
Why his ritualistic, deliberate pace drives fast players crazy
The matches that sparked the biggest controversies
Why referees rarely step in
How Luke Littler exposed the blueprint for beating him
Where the line really sits between gamesmanship and cheating
Suljovic operates within the rules.
He doesn’t exceed time limits.
But does he know his pace unsettles opponents — and use it to his advantage?
In a sport increasingly dominated by speed and rhythm, Mensur Suljovic stands apart. Whether by design or necessity, his style has become one of the most divisive weapons in professional darts.
👉 Is this clever psychology… or crossing an ethical line?
RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states “Fair dealing” with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).———————————————————————————————————————–
Contact:
[amazon_auto_links id="551"]